Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX07V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.26]) by napdx-msmbx03p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
	 Mon, 3 Jun 2002 11:41:59 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Return-Receipt-To: "Lew, Elsie" <Elsie.Lew@ENRON.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Subject: RE: BPA Dec. 01, DMS #12593
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:41:57 -0500
Message-ID: <8DF81A1206FB4D46A72201D2EF9B1B5518CFC7@NAHOU-MSMBX07V.corp.enron.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <8DF81A1206FB4D46A72201D2EF9B1B5518CFC7@NAHOU-MSMBX07V.corp.enron.com>
Thread-Topic: to portland for bpa.xls
Thread-Index: AcIB0Atl8hog6LOtTn2pjQXkGGqB+AAAB4BQAACQNcAAAD4WQAAAVjzAAYWbXrAADjPNoADCUsZQ
From: "Lew, Elsie" <Elsie.Lew@ENRON.com>
To: "Thome, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Thome@ENRON.com>
Cc: "Gang, Lisa" <Lisa.Gang@ENRON.com>
Return-Path: Elsie.Lew@ENRON.com

Jennifer,
Yes, I do believe you have the correct understanding.  The ttls you have tie to the dms impact. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Elsie


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thome, Jennifer  
Sent:	Thursday, May 30, 2002 6:15 PM
To:	Lew, Elsie
Cc:	Gang, Lisa
Subject:	BPA Dec. 01, DMS #12593

Elsie:

Sorry, in looking over this again with Lisa, we want to be sure that we understand the request correctly.  

See attached for my understanding of what you are requesting and please confirm.

I looked at this from the perspective of each entire deal.  For each, I took the total price and volume of the deal and subtracted/added the MWs you specified and then calculated the revised value of each deal.  

Is this a correct understanding of the changes needed and their impact?

Thanks, Jenny

 << File: 12593 - BPA.xls >> 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lew, Elsie  
Sent:	Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:05 AM
To:	Thome, Jennifer
Subject:	RE: to portland for bpa.xls

Hey Jennifer,
	Did you have any more questions related to this?
Thanks,
Elsie
713-853-6757

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thome, Jennifer  
Sent:	Wednesday, May 22, 2002 4:08 PM
To:	Lew, Elsie
Subject:	RE: to portland for bpa.xls

Got it, thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lew, Elsie  
Sent:	Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Thome, Jennifer
Subject:	RE: to portland for bpa.xls

Jennifer,,,,,I updated the dms....in the comment section this is for 2 deals...the difference between enpwer mw and revised mw will be 8150 mw (12600mw revised to 4450mw)...the spreadsheet is the detail for the changes needed and not totals for the deals.  

Thanks,
Elsie


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thome, Jennifer  
Sent:	Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:56 PM
To:	Lew, Elsie
Subject:	RE: to portland for bpa.xls

Elsie:

Thanks for the welcome!

Already I have a quick question - in the attached spreadsheet, the disputed MW columns seem to add up to 12600 and 4450.  In reading the DMS, I would expect them to add up to 14600 and 5600 (or 12600 and 3600, if I only include the referrenced deal, #12593). Am I missing something?

Jenny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lew, Elsie  
Sent:	Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:36 PM
To:	Thome, Jennifer
Subject:	FW: to portland for bpa.xls

....and welcome aboard!


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lew, Elsie  
Sent:	Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:34 PM
To:	Thome, Jennifer; Thompson, Virginia
Cc:	Grace, Rebecca M.
Subject:	to portland for bpa.xls

 << File: to portland for bpa.xls >> 
Hello,,,,,this is the support of the chgs needed for dms request 12593.  If you have questions or need additional info, I'm at 713-853-6757.

Thanks,
Elsie